This image features popular YouTubers (from left to right) Marcus Butler, Joe Sugg, Zoe Sugg (Zoella), and Alfie Deyes. This specific photo was taken during a collaboration or social gathering in the mid-2010s, a time when these creators were at the peak of their YouTube fame.
I assume the others are more readily recognizable.
I figured as much, but inquiring minds want to know.
Besides those people went thru plastic surgery just for your Algodoo scene. The least you could do is mention their names.
Yes, works as intended. Congratulations on fixing the issue. Creating new application variables is not good practice, better to use "Scene.my." variables.
I was thinking the same thing when I made the scene. Here's one way of looking at it:
Imagine you start with a straight rack and a 12‑tooth pinion gear.
Make the rack exactly twice the circumference of the pinion. If you roll the pinion along the rack from left to right, the pinion will make two full rotations by the time it reaches the end.
At that final position, freeze the pinion relative to the rack—as if you welded them together.
Now hold the left end of the rack fixed, and bend the rack into a circle so its ends meet. You can bend it so the teeth face outward (forming an external gear) or inward (forming an internal gear).
When the rack is bent into a circle, the gear that was “frozen” at the end of the rack is forced to undergo one additional rotation (for an external gear) or one fewer rotation (for an internal gear) in order to close the loop smoothly.
AI offers this simpler explanation:
Think of a planet gear rolling around a sun gear.
When a gear rolls around the outside of another gear (external mesh), it not only turns because of the tooth engagement — it also turns once more because it is physically walking around a circle.
When a gear rolls inside another gear (internal mesh), the walking direction is reversed, so it effectively turns one less time.
Cracked it. I will confirm how I cracked it after other user's responses. You should give users instructions on how to verify that the scene is cracked.
Idea: Add _question in the appropriate place where the question will indirectly reveal that the respondent has read the question, while the answer itself does not reveal the question. The question should allow for multiple valid answers.
There are no images included in this scene. Either Xray forgot that images not displayed will not be saved or a blank screen is the joke. Code suggests the former.
I like the fact that it displays frequency, amplitude, and phase of each spring-mass system. You could do the calculation for natural frequency for each one and display the appropriate motor speed under each spring-mass pair.
This scene is against the Algobox rules, or the rules need to change. As far as I can figure out, the scene must be using my web cam to display my face.
Sort of. Each person on the trampoline is like one of these masses with its own “natural” bounce frequency, and the trampoline surface is like the driving bar. When people jump in sync with the trampoline’s motion (or with each other), you get large, regular oscillations—like resonance in one of the springs. When they’re out of sync, their forces add and cancel in complicated ways, so the motion looks irregular and “chaotic,” even though it’s all just the superposition of many simple oscillations. This scene is basically a clean, 1D version of that messy trampoline behavior.
T_Reißig,
Thanks for the understanding, kind words, and encouragement.
I agree with your assessment. I would expect that the forces on the orange bars would match. The normal forces on the left and right orange bars do not match.
Recalibrated the scene using a tri‑axially hyperencabulated whimsy buffer to keep the volumetric gas from leaking into forbidden dimensions. The collision lattice should now maintain its traditional level of dignified nonsense.