more collidesets

Suggest changes and improvements to Algodoo.

more collidesets

Postby CasperFalandysz » Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:55 pm

hey can you people working for algoryx please add 4+ more collidesets. Not that I am sure but I guess it would only take a hour or less :thumbup: would be nice when making stuff or scenes using many collides :D please do it would be really glad if you did (as said earlier it cant take that long, can it?) thats all BTW there should be some smiley waving xD some people could say nice goodbye after a comment :angel:
CasperFalandysz
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: more collidesets

Postby jakedmoon » Wed Jan 05, 2011 7:24 pm

i believe this has been suggested many times before im sure that algoryx will implement this anyway they added 4 more with phun beta 5 and 3 more with algodoo so im sure with the next installment they will add a few more
Ουλές αποτελούν απόδειξη ότι το παρελθόν υπήρχε.
User avatar
jakedmoon
 
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:41 pm
Location: earth

Re: more collidesets

Postby Rrobba » Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:11 am

Yes, I would like more collide-sets, however to be honest I don't think there is much need for them due to the vast amount of collision combinations that can already be made. Still, a few more wouldn't hurt.

PS: This has been suggested countless times before.
Image
I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.
User avatar
Rrobba
[Best Sig 2010]
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: Gibraltar

Re: more collidesets

Postby Rideg » Thu Jan 06, 2011 10:00 pm

I supported this before I still do it. Could ease up somethings but as Rrobba said. It has been suggested +inf times :P
Image
make sure to check out my work.
User avatar
Rideg
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Östersund, Sweden

Re: more collidesets

Postby CasperFalandysz » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:43 pm

:mrgreen: forgot to search but would still like some more :thumbup: BTW it would be nice with some more options for attraction also, a few check boxes for directions to attract from :thumbup: not so realistic but would be nice
CasperFalandysz
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: more collidesets

Postby Someone Else » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:55 pm

They added collide sets with Algodoo? 5.28 and 1.8.0 both have seven...or will Algodoo register numbers larger than 127 in the script menu?

@Raydeg- I think +inf in a slight overstatement. But even so I fully support.

I would also support a checkbox in the collision layer menu labeled something like Inclusive No Self Collision, meaning that two geoms with this checked WILL NOT COLLIDE. PERIOD. It would really help with a project I have that stalled long ago.

@CasperFalandysz- See my earlier topic in this forum:http://www.algodoo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=3284
Matthias Wandel is epic, in my humble opinion.
I love my brain...
TC42 wrote:Also, your sig is too big, please change it.

ARE YA HAPPY NOW?????

Thymechanic/Phundamentalist

Recently, I discovered something a lot of you probably already knew: Minecraft is awesome.
Due to this, I may not be as active as usual for a while.
User avatar
Someone Else
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:53 pm
Location: The Milky Way Galaxy

Re: more collidesets

Postby Rideg » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:17 pm

Someone Else wrote:@Raydeg- I think +inf in a slight overstatement

I disagree. Laws of physics have been broken in theese forums before :O
Image
make sure to check out my work.
User avatar
Rideg
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Östersund, Sweden

Re: more collidesets

Postby davidz40 » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:33 pm

There's other solution - Only self collision checkbox would effectively give 256 collision groups!
Phundamentalist
User avatar
davidz40
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:30 am

Re: more collidesets

Postby frogman786 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:33 am

i support it giving about 5 more would help alot
DFTBA nerdfighters

TheWonkits wrote:As immature as some of the people on this forum can be, most of you are pretty cool.

TC42 wrote:Better than spell-check... ...TC42's instant grammar-correction posts! :lol:
User avatar
frogman786
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:32 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand


Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests