Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Work together on Algodoo projects here.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby immibis » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:11 am

Is this collab dead now or just sleeping? Nobody's posted for over two weeks.
Thymechanic
immibis
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:24 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby izacque » Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:06 am

when you put "programmer" as part of the list of available jobs, did you mean thyme programmer? or someone to make programs that the computer you build can run?
[/post]
Paradigm 29 wrote:I've been trying to figure out why people even buy hummers ever since I found out that they don't have machine guns.
User avatar
izacque
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:14 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby macunixgeek » Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:34 am

I think he meant someone to write assembly language programs for the computer to run. BTW, I can create a block design for a computer if that would help.
Thymer
macunixgeek
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:55 pm

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby immibis » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:30 am

It might, but we are (were?) starting from the bottom up, making logic gates etc first and replacing them with scripted parts (this is a Phundamentalist collab, except for one line of code)
Thymechanic
immibis
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:24 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby xplane80 » Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:59 pm

If you want a base for the computer, why don't you copy the computer from when we did the PCP Collab. Just change it to make it with lasers instead of circles. Also I will help with the programming if you want.
Image<- Designed by PhysicsGuy
User avatar
xplane80
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:26 am

I have some good news.
I have created a RAM template one is 80 kb and one is 18 kb.
By the way, if you cannot seem to post entries bcause u cant find file in explorer,
create a new phz file with notepad edit it and import the file you wish to post.
________________________________________________________________________
Today's victim is Cherie<-my nooby sister(of course)
We are going to blend her.
^ This is signature
| Help signature to take over the forums!
|
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:04 am

Hmmm I was thinking that we should create a addon so that Algodoo will b able to translate script into binary.
We can then convert the binary back to script.
But wait a sec, we cant use thyme cause thyme is not powerful enough.(No insults Emil)
I suggest to use Lua 5.1 cause they provide free GNU freeware lisence with it so that we can modify its source code with no permission.
So the only thing we need to cover is a Script2Bin and Bin2Script addon...
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Computer hacker,6
Likes to chew bubble gum.
Blend a Cherie a day, keep the doctor away!
Cherie smoothies, Cherie patties , would like to have Cherie fries with that?
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby xplane80 » Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:38 pm

@Hichew If you used lua, then we would have to make the computer be able to read lua so this would be a compiler and more which is very difficult (can be done but would take weeks upon weeks0.
Image<- Designed by PhysicsGuy
User avatar
xplane80
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:20 am

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<post>
<quote persorn="xplane80">
<li>...if you use lua ...[blah blah blah]</li>
</quote>
<comment>So what? Lua comes with a interpreter so that we dont need to make one.</comment>
</post>
By the way Condrummer can you just post your RAM soloution by now cause I dont know know how to make one.I thought of using No Selfcollision but lazers dont have that property.
<sig(oops forgot to create a xml tag)>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8?>
... I hate link he locked my phun hoverbrick topic...
*posts* HAHAHA LINK NOW WHOS CRYING NOW(lol)
Mos importanly : Cheat Engine Progress-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10
NOW IM GONNA HACK YOUR COMPUTER LINK HAHAHA *implants logic bomb*
Edit:
I finnaly learned digital logic i can prove it 2 u Condrummer:
4 bit adder (unsigned)
Inupts (I) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Temp (C) 1 2 3 4 Outputs (O) [Sorry this is a 4 bit adder so i need 8 bit answer incase I+C+O=11]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (I 4321) (I 8765) (O 87654321)
O1=I1 XOR I5
C1=I1 AND I5
O2=(I2 NAND I6) XOR C1
C2=(I2 AND I6) XOR C1
O3=(I3 NAND I7) XOR C1
C3=(I3 AND I7) XOR C1
O4=(I4 NAND I8) XOR C1
C4=(I4 AND I8) XOR C1
O5=C4
O6-O8=0
Edit(2): I think we need 2 RAM 2 CPU and 2 Hard Drive one 4 data one 4 Lua
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby oops_ur_dead » Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:50 pm

These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.
oops_ur_dead
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:26 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:01 am

Mr (stupid)oops_ur_dead wrote:These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

HELLO A CD DRIVE DOES NOT NEED A PROCESSER I JUST MEAN A CD DRIVE ITSELF!!!!!
Yeah buy for the reader I will need some help considering they use binary written to the drives.

Anyway I'm modifiying a Lua fomula that calculates prime factors so that we will know 1002 Mb=6 collision x ? size per sector x ? coloums for the RAM . The 2 MUST be the smallest prime factors if possible.
Spoiler: show
You suck link007!
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby KarateBrot » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:56 pm

hichew wrote:
Spoiler: show
You suck link007!


that wasn't necessary :problem:
Image
User avatar
KarateBrot
 
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:32 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby RicH » Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:10 pm

hichew wrote:Hmmm I was thinking that we should create a addon so that Algodoo will b able to translate script into binary.
We can then convert the binary back to script.

The fuck.
hichew wrote:____________________________________________________________________________________________
Computer hacker,6
Likes to chew bubble gum.
Blend a Cherie a day, keep the doctor away!
Cherie smoothies, Cherie patties , would like to have Cherie fries with that?

And he doesn't even know how to use a signature.

I sense wannabe. :roll:
Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened.
User avatar
RicH
[Funniest Person 2010]
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby oops_ur_dead » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:04 am

hichew wrote:
Mr (stupid)oops_ur_dead wrote:These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

HELLO A CD DRIVE DOES NOT NEED A PROCESSER I JUST MEAN A CD DRIVE ITSELF!!!!!

Ehm yes it does. They have a microchip to control the laser and the such. Explain to me exactly WHAT will use the CD drive if we do not have a processor? Thats like buying custom leather seats for a car, but you dont own a car yet.
oops_ur_dead
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:26 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:46 am

oh sry anyways i figured out that we only need 22 lasers for one line of thyme.
Here it goes: (o=data point)
...........RAM...................................READER AS [12345]
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................1:Auto erase collision A/B
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................2:Switch collision B
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................3:Switch collision A
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................4:Read collision B/A
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................5:Write collison B/A

Sorry for all the dots its used for spacing.
I HATE LOSSY COMPRESSION

BECON (we need two one 4 real and one for inverted)
Uses 1 laser 1 beam spliter and 2 onHitByLaser geometery 1 line of thyme controlling dyanmic user definded varible eg:Scene.my.SwitchRAM1.
The laser's thyme than use the collision data as eg: e.geom.collideSet=Scene.my.SwitchRAM1 OR this.collideSet=[Scene.my.SwitchRAM1].
I'm still figuring out the exact numbers
_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
ANYWAYS THE READER WILL BE A SEPERATE READER AT THE OLD DAYS RAM READS ITSELF AND SENDS INFO TO COMPUTER BUT THAT DIDNT LAST SO GOODBYE OLD RAM! :mrgreen:
That dosen't compare to normal computers. It compares to LASER RAM LOL this is a useless post
_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE (AGAIN) THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
By the way RicH I am going to create a very long signature that comprises "I want tacos!" in
C#,C,C++,VB,BASIC,Thyme,Javascript and AIML.
See you at your will-be lousy signature! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Last edited by hichew on Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby RicH » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:14 am

hichew wrote:_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE (AGAIN) THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
By the way RicH I am going to create a very long signature that comprises "I want tacos!" in
C#,C,C++,C+,VB,BASIC,Thyme,Javascript and AIML.
See you at your will-be lousy signature! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

That just made you look real retarded.
Why the hell would I care if you did that? Piece of useless crap.
Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened.
User avatar
RicH
[Funniest Person 2010]
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby Fujitsu » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:43 am

What kind of language is "C+"? Never heard of it. :ugeek:
Image
Gimmie money.
User avatar
Fujitsu
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:28 am
Location: Canada

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby oops_ur_dead » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:32 pm

hichew wrote:_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
ANYWAYS THE READER WILL BE A SEPERATE READER AT THE OLD DAYS RAM READS ITSELF AND SENDS INFO TO COMPUTER BUT THAT DIDNT LAST SO GOODBYE OLD RAM! :mrgreen:
That dosen't compare to normal computers. It compares to LASER RAM LOL this is a useless post

Hit the nail right on the head, there.
oops_ur_dead
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:26 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:49 am

hello are you blind or is your computer infected i didnt put C+
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby RicH » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:27 am

hichew wrote:hello are you blind or is your computer infected i didnt put C+

You can edit your post, but you can't change the quotes. :lol:
Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened.
User avatar
RicH
[Funniest Person 2010]
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 am

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby cdh473 » Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:11 pm

hichew wrote: ...........RAM............
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |

And I will forever more call any 5 string guitar tab a RAM.
Please excuse my posts. I am extremely stupid.
User avatar
cdh473
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:37 am
Location: Yes

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby Conundrumer » Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:24 am

Okay, I appreciate the revival of this thread, but what the hell is going on here?
hichew: How old are you? If you can't have some bit of maturity, get out of my thread.
I don't really understand what you're trying to do, anyways.
If you're using any scripting besides that one line of code, or any substitution of any existing module, you're doing it wrong.
Those who are actually trying to help: Sorry for the inactivity, I'm having a phase of being tired of Algodoo.
Those attacking hichew: That's enough flaming.
oops_ur_dead wrote:These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

The full adder isn't too difficult to make; it's just that I've been too busy/lazy to update, I'll admit.
The CD drive is just a memory storage device. It won't do anything except read and write. Even though there's no processor to control it, it can technically still work by using it manually. No matter where the input is coming from, if it's a valid input, it will work.
User avatar
Conundrumer
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:55 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby xplane80 » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:33 pm

Fujitsu wrote:What kind of language is "C+"? Never heard of it. :ugeek:

C+ doesn't exist but C+- does and C+-* does.
Image<- Designed by PhysicsGuy
User avatar
xplane80
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby Fujitsu » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:15 am

xplane80 wrote:
Fujitsu wrote:What kind of language is "C+"? Never heard of it. :ugeek:

C+ doesn't exist but C+- does and C+-* does.


I was under the impression that those were joke languages? :?
Image
Gimmie money.
User avatar
Fujitsu
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:28 am
Location: Canada

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

Postby hichew » Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:15 am

...WE HAVE TO FOCUS ON THE COMPONENTS AND NOT LOGIC GATE
OUR REASON WHY WE USED LASER IS BECAUSE WE WANT FASTER COMMUCATION BUT
APPERENTLY WE ARE OUTTA POINT USE ExpressSCH and see what i mean NOW
hichew
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:21 am

PreviousNext

Return to Collab forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest