Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:50 amI.
Hate.
You.
Hate.
You.
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:50 amRe: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:51 pmPlease try not to bump topics that died 8 months ago.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:50 am*looks at crazy contraptions*..............*facepalms*............ Why not make a box fixed to the backround that spawns a circle shooting at the enemy, that when it collides, it fixes it self to the backround, then it gives it self am extreemly high density and attraction, that is immortal and a killer.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:54 amWhy not check post dates?
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:23 amSry, I keep forgeting. I didn't realize that there was a second page 
man this forum is old, someone should post something new for a change, caught myself nearly bumping, ohhh say the 6 SILY OLD TOPICS!!! I can't post something new becuase I can't come up with new ideas anymore, it's just my brain has just gone lgdypwosofospgtohira7(£:69"!6:£:0)::(9)/<+&(4..<+\+\850}+\
man this forum is old, someone should post something new for a change, caught myself nearly bumping, ohhh say the 6 SILY OLD TOPICS!!! I can't post something new becuase I can't come up with new ideas anymore, it's just my brain has just gone lgdypwosofospgtohira7(£:69"!6:£:0)::(9)/<+&(4..<+\+\850}+\
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:09 pmIs there really multiplayer at Algodoo? Wow that's sick. But it sounds fun!
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:39 pmthere isn't multiplayer in algodoo, this is only sharing scenes or something with eachother (didn't read the post 
)
)Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:43 amOne more bump in this thread, and ima kill someone.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:31 pmSorry, didn't hear that last post. What?
But seriously, before you all get your flamethrowers ready, this could make a good contest. We just need to instate some rules. It doesn't have to be online, we can just upload scenes to Algobox, and set limits for he number of objects, and such. We could have rules about scripting, so that you can't just trash everything with a luiquify-ing laser.
I would even upload a base scene, with "build boxes", so that you couldn't make something too large, or have too many robots of doom.
But seriously, before you all get your flamethrowers ready, this could make a good contest. We just need to instate some rules. It doesn't have to be online, we can just upload scenes to Algobox, and set limits for he number of objects, and such. We could have rules about scripting, so that you can't just trash everything with a luiquify-ing laser.
I would even upload a base scene, with "build boxes", so that you couldn't make something too large, or have too many robots of doom.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:57 pm- LET SLEEPING THREADS LIE
- CAPISCE?
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:43 pmНет.
Warum sollen wir das nicht machen?
It would be interesting.
Warum sollen wir das nicht machen?
It would be interesting.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:38 ambecause you are not contributing anything of significance to a dead thread. the op hasn't posted anything of significance in over four years. the thread is dead, the original poster is dead, the concept is dead. if you want to turn this into a contest, make a thread in the contests forum, THAT IS WHAT THE CONTESTS FORUM IS FOR. stop bumping dead posts.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:49 am1) It would be nice if you used proper grammer in ur sentencez.
2) The rules state that if a post is relevant to the original topic, then you are allowed to bump the thread.
3) I actually HAVE contributed something of significance, if you'd read my post instead of immediately replying, maybe you would have noticed.
4) This is a legitimate idea, I think it be interesting.
5) I know someone else is going to jump in on this. *Holds up riot shield*
2) The rules state that if a post is relevant to the original topic, then you are allowed to bump the thread.
3) I actually HAVE contributed something of significance, if you'd read my post instead of immediately replying, maybe you would have noticed.
4) This is a legitimate idea, I think it be interesting.
5) I know someone else is going to jump in on this. *Holds up riot shield*
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:01 pm1: are you talking about my lack of capitalization at the beginning of sentences? deal with it
2: which rules?
3: what did I miss?
4: see 3, and my comment about the contest forum
5: I got this, bro?
2: which rules?
3: what did I miss?
4: see 3, and my comment about the contest forum
5: I got this, bro?
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:56 amWhy do you even care? Trying to make me look bad won't make you look better to anyone else.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:53 amI'm not trying to make you look bad, you've done a good enough job at that already. what I care about, and am trying to do, is encourage you to be self-reliant; specifically with regards to making contests. the only thing that is preventing you from doing what you want is you
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:55 amYes, I make myself look bad with horribel grammer and spellingg and i dont have good punchuation
But you certainly are tying to make me look bad. You want to prove yourself to everyone else. And this seems to be a "good" way to accomplish that. What does self-reliance have to do with it? I'm not using anybody else for anything. You are, obviously, since you're trying to make yourself look good by making me look bad.
What's preventing me from doing what I want is YOU. Now let's get this back on topic, shall we?
Since nobody seems to be expressing any sort of interest, I'll just forget about this thread for now.
But you certainly are tying to make me look bad. You want to prove yourself to everyone else. And this seems to be a "good" way to accomplish that. What does self-reliance have to do with it? I'm not using anybody else for anything. You are, obviously, since you're trying to make yourself look good by making me look bad.
What's preventing me from doing what I want is YOU. Now let's get this back on topic, shall we?
Since nobody seems to be expressing any sort of interest, I'll just forget about this thread for now.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:23 amprove what? that technically I am right? well I think I did that a couple of posts back, so I guess that's right, I'm holding the big man on campus down. you're the one who wants the contest, you're the one who's posting in the wrong forum, and you're the one who seems to think that my sentence capitalization is important (it's not, get over it)
I still haven't seen a post in the contests forum, or even a scene regarding this. until you follow through you can't say I'm trying to make you look bad, because I'm not really trying
mold999 wrote:this could make a good contest. We just need to instate some rules. It doesn't have to be online, we can just upload scenes to Algobox, and set limits for he number of objects, and such. We could have rules about scripting, so that you can't just trash everything with a luiquify-ing laser.
I would even upload a base scene, with "build boxes", so that you couldn't make something too large, or have too many robots of doom.
I still haven't seen a post in the contests forum, or even a scene regarding this. until you follow through you can't say I'm trying to make you look bad, because I'm not really trying
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:12 pmI think we can agree that, even if you're trying to bring this back, it's not going to work. There's just not enough people.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:43 pmChronos wrote:I think we can agree that, even if you're trying to bring this back, it's not going to work. There's just not enough people.
I second this. Unfortunately.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:42 ammold999 wrote:Since nobody seems to be expressing any sort of interest, I'll just forget about this thread for now.
Did anyone see this line?
But yes, I understand your points. Thread = Dead.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:49 ammold999 wrote:mold999 wrote:Since nobody seems to be expressing any sort of interest, I'll just forget about this thread for now.
Did anyone see this line?
But yes, I understand your points. Thread = Dead.
I think everyone saw that line (in fact, the forum software makes a point of showing new threads that have been posted while you were writing your own post)
but something's not right, you haven't forgotten about the thread; again, missing on the follow through
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:43 amIf I say, "I'm going to stop talking now" to someone in person, that doesn't mean that the fact that I chose to inform the person that I would not be talking means I am contradicting myself.
I asked if anyone saw that line, since two other people commented on how the thread should be forgotten. Following this, I will not respond to any more posts here, unless they are relevant to the original topic.
I asked if anyone saw that line, since two other people commented on how the thread should be forgotten. Following this, I will not respond to any more posts here, unless they are relevant to the original topic.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:31 pmAnd yet we talk, ohohoho. Dibs on this being the last post.
Re: Algodoo Wars
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:57 amthanks RicH, I didn't want to be too much of a dick to mold. 