Page 5 of 6

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:11 am
by immibis
Is this collab dead now or just sleeping? Nobody's posted for over two weeks.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:06 am
by izacque
when you put "programmer" as part of the list of available jobs, did you mean thyme programmer? or someone to make programs that the computer you build can run?

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:34 am
by macunixgeek
I think he meant someone to write assembly language programs for the computer to run. BTW, I can create a block design for a computer if that would help.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:30 am
by immibis
It might, but we are (were?) starting from the bottom up, making logic gates etc first and replacing them with scripted parts (this is a Phundamentalist collab, except for one line of code)

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:59 pm
by xplane80
If you want a base for the computer, why don't you copy the computer from when we did the PCP Collab. Just change it to make it with lasers instead of circles. Also I will help with the programming if you want.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:26 am
by hichew
I have some good news.
I have created a RAM template one is 80 kb and one is 18 kb.
By the way, if you cannot seem to post entries bcause u cant find file in explorer,
create a new phz file with notepad edit it and import the file you wish to post.
________________________________________________________________________
Today's victim is Cherie<-my nooby sister(of course)
We are going to blend her.
^ This is signature
| Help signature to take over the forums!
|

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:04 am
by hichew
Hmmm I was thinking that we should create a addon so that Algodoo will b able to translate script into binary.
We can then convert the binary back to script.
But wait a sec, we cant use thyme cause thyme is not powerful enough.(No insults Emil)
I suggest to use Lua 5.1 cause they provide free GNU freeware lisence with it so that we can modify its source code with no permission.
So the only thing we need to cover is a Script2Bin and Bin2Script addon...
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Computer hacker,6
Likes to chew bubble gum.
Blend a Cherie a day, keep the doctor away!
Cherie smoothies, Cherie patties , would like to have Cherie fries with that?

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:38 pm
by xplane80
@Hichew If you used lua, then we would have to make the computer be able to read lua so this would be a compiler and more which is very difficult (can be done but would take weeks upon weeks0.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:20 am
by hichew
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<post>
<quote persorn="xplane80">
<li>...if you use lua ...[blah blah blah]</li>
</quote>
<comment>So what? Lua comes with a interpreter so that we dont need to make one.</comment>
</post>
By the way Condrummer can you just post your RAM soloution by now cause I dont know know how to make one.I thought of using No Selfcollision but lazers dont have that property.
<sig(oops forgot to create a xml tag)>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8?>
... I hate link he locked my phun hoverbrick topic...
*posts* HAHAHA LINK NOW WHOS CRYING NOW(lol)
Mos importanly : Cheat Engine Progress-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10
NOW IM GONNA HACK YOUR COMPUTER LINK HAHAHA *implants logic bomb*
Edit:
I finnaly learned digital logic i can prove it 2 u Condrummer:
4 bit adder (unsigned)
Inupts (I) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Temp (C) 1 2 3 4 Outputs (O) [Sorry this is a 4 bit adder so i need 8 bit answer incase I+C+O=11]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (I 4321) (I 8765) (O 87654321)
O1=I1 XOR I5
C1=I1 AND I5
O2=(I2 NAND I6) XOR C1
C2=(I2 AND I6) XOR C1
O3=(I3 NAND I7) XOR C1
C3=(I3 AND I7) XOR C1
O4=(I4 NAND I8) XOR C1
C4=(I4 AND I8) XOR C1
O5=C4
O6-O8=0
Edit(2): I think we need 2 RAM 2 CPU and 2 Hard Drive one 4 data one 4 Lua

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:50 pm
by oops_ur_dead
These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:01 am
by hichew
Mr (stupid)oops_ur_dead wrote:These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

HELLO A CD DRIVE DOES NOT NEED A PROCESSER I JUST MEAN A CD DRIVE ITSELF!!!!!
Yeah buy for the reader I will need some help considering they use binary written to the drives.

Anyway I'm modifiying a Lua fomula that calculates prime factors so that we will know 1002 Mb=6 collision x ? size per sector x ? coloums for the RAM . The 2 MUST be the smallest prime factors if possible.
Spoiler: show
You suck link007!

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:56 pm
by KarateBrot
hichew wrote:
Spoiler: show
You suck link007!


that wasn't necessary :problem:

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:10 pm
by RicH
hichew wrote:Hmmm I was thinking that we should create a addon so that Algodoo will b able to translate script into binary.
We can then convert the binary back to script.

The fuck.
hichew wrote:____________________________________________________________________________________________
Computer hacker,6
Likes to chew bubble gum.
Blend a Cherie a day, keep the doctor away!
Cherie smoothies, Cherie patties , would like to have Cherie fries with that?

And he doesn't even know how to use a signature.

I sense wannabe. :roll:

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:04 am
by oops_ur_dead
hichew wrote:
Mr (stupid)oops_ur_dead wrote:These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

HELLO A CD DRIVE DOES NOT NEED A PROCESSER I JUST MEAN A CD DRIVE ITSELF!!!!!

Ehm yes it does. They have a microchip to control the laser and the such. Explain to me exactly WHAT will use the CD drive if we do not have a processor? Thats like buying custom leather seats for a car, but you dont own a car yet.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:46 am
by hichew
oh sry anyways i figured out that we only need 22 lasers for one line of thyme.
Here it goes: (o=data point)
...........RAM...................................READER AS [12345]
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................1:Auto erase collision A/B
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................2:Switch collision B
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................3:Switch collision A
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................4:Read collision B/A
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |.................................12345.................5:Write collison B/A

Sorry for all the dots its used for spacing.
I HATE LOSSY COMPRESSION

BECON (we need two one 4 real and one for inverted)
Uses 1 laser 1 beam spliter and 2 onHitByLaser geometery 1 line of thyme controlling dyanmic user definded varible eg:Scene.my.SwitchRAM1.
The laser's thyme than use the collision data as eg: e.geom.collideSet=Scene.my.SwitchRAM1 OR this.collideSet=[Scene.my.SwitchRAM1].
I'm still figuring out the exact numbers
_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
ANYWAYS THE READER WILL BE A SEPERATE READER AT THE OLD DAYS RAM READS ITSELF AND SENDS INFO TO COMPUTER BUT THAT DIDNT LAST SO GOODBYE OLD RAM! :mrgreen:
That dosen't compare to normal computers. It compares to LASER RAM LOL this is a useless post
_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE (AGAIN) THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
By the way RicH I am going to create a very long signature that comprises "I want tacos!" in
C#,C,C++,VB,BASIC,Thyme,Javascript and AIML.
See you at your will-be lousy signature! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:14 am
by RicH
hichew wrote:_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE (AGAIN) THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
By the way RicH I am going to create a very long signature that comprises "I want tacos!" in
C#,C,C++,C+,VB,BASIC,Thyme,Javascript and AIML.
See you at your will-be lousy signature! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

That just made you look real retarded.
Why the hell would I care if you did that? Piece of useless crap.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:43 am
by Fujitsu
What kind of language is "C+"? Never heard of it. :ugeek:

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:32 pm
by oops_ur_dead
hichew wrote:_______________________________________________________________________________________
THIS IS NOT A SIGNATURE THIS IS JUST JUNK SECTION
ANYWAYS THE READER WILL BE A SEPERATE READER AT THE OLD DAYS RAM READS ITSELF AND SENDS INFO TO COMPUTER BUT THAT DIDNT LAST SO GOODBYE OLD RAM! :mrgreen:
That dosen't compare to normal computers. It compares to LASER RAM LOL this is a useless post

Hit the nail right on the head, there.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:49 am
by hichew
hello are you blind or is your computer infected i didnt put C+

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:27 am
by RicH
hichew wrote:hello are you blind or is your computer infected i didnt put C+

You can edit your post, but you can't change the quotes. :lol:

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:11 pm
by cdh473
hichew wrote: ...........RAM............
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |
|.. o.. o.. o.. o.. o.. |

And I will forever more call any 5 string guitar tab a RAM.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:24 am
by Conundrumer
Okay, I appreciate the revival of this thread, but what the hell is going on here?
hichew: How old are you? If you can't have some bit of maturity, get out of my thread.
I don't really understand what you're trying to do, anyways.
If you're using any scripting besides that one line of code, or any substitution of any existing module, you're doing it wrong.
Those who are actually trying to help: Sorry for the inactivity, I'm having a phase of being tired of Algodoo.
Those attacking hichew: That's enough flaming.
oops_ur_dead wrote:These computer collabs are notorious for having many users who dont know what a computer is and how to prioritize. We can't yet have a CD drive because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to control the CD drive! We cant build a Lua compiler yet because, lo and behold, we dont have a processor yet to run the compiled code! We dont even have a full adder, one of the fundamental pieces of a CPU.

The full adder isn't too difficult to make; it's just that I've been too busy/lazy to update, I'll admit.
The CD drive is just a memory storage device. It won't do anything except read and write. Even though there's no processor to control it, it can technically still work by using it manually. No matter where the input is coming from, if it's a valid input, it will work.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:33 pm
by xplane80
Fujitsu wrote:What kind of language is "C+"? Never heard of it. :ugeek:

C+ doesn't exist but C+- does and C+-* does.

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:15 am
by Fujitsu
xplane80 wrote:
Fujitsu wrote:What kind of language is "C+"? Never heard of it. :ugeek:

C+ doesn't exist but C+- does and C+-* does.


I was under the impression that those were joke languages? :?

Re: Digital Laser Computer Collab (DLCC)

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:15 am
by hichew
...WE HAVE TO FOCUS ON THE COMPONENTS AND NOT LOGIC GATE
OUR REASON WHY WE USED LASER IS BECAUSE WE WANT FASTER COMMUCATION BUT
APPERENTLY WE ARE OUTTA POINT USE ExpressSCH and see what i mean NOW