Rulers on Circles
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
Rulers on Circles
Having rulers on circles? I think this would be helpful on somethings.
<- Designed by PhysicsGuy-

xplane80 - Posts: 498
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:28 pm
Re: Rulers on Circles
I think what he wants is a ruler that goes across the diameter of the circle. 
-

standardtoaster - Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:57 pm
Re: Rulers on Circles
k, then having a ruler like that would be the equivalent of having a 100+ sided grid(lag)
Jrv wrote:TC42 wrote:Quite honestly, I didn't think anyone on 4chan has that good a use of grammar, spelling, usage, mechanics, ect.
But I've never been there, so I may be wrong.
GTFO newfgt
-

RA2lover - Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:43 pm
- Location: Brazil
Re: Rulers on Circles
Why would you need that?
Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened.
-

RicH - [Funniest Person 2010]
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 am
Re: Rulers on Circles
Maybe he means radius/diameter? 
TheWinkits wrote:They both looks of cuking amazing
-

Chronos - [Most Active Member 2010]
- Posts: 4457
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:00 pm
- Location: Californania
Re: Rulers on Circles
Yeah I mean Radius and Diameter. I know I can figure out the radius by dividing the are by pi and then square root it but I would like it to be easier.
<- Designed by PhysicsGuy-

xplane80 - Posts: 498
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:28 pm
Re: Rulers on Circles
Get a box, make it a ruler. Use that.
:\
:\
Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened.
-

RicH - [Funniest Person 2010]
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 am
Re: Rulers on Circles
It won't be as accurate as this.
TheWinkits wrote:They both looks of cuking amazing
-

Chronos - [Most Active Member 2010]
- Posts: 4457
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:00 pm
- Location: Californania
Re: Rulers on Circles
With the way he suggested it, it would be as accurate. Having 'rulers' on a circle. Imagine it.
A better way would be to get directly the radius of the circle, instead of having 'rulers' on a circle.
A better way would be to get directly the radius of the circle, instead of having 'rulers' on a circle.
Millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened.
-

RicH - [Funniest Person 2010]
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 am
Re: Rulers on Circles
Maybe we could see the dimentions of a shape in the information menu. (for circles and boxes only)
-

Nxdt - Posts: 1019
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:32 pm
- Location: Scotland!
Re: Rulers on Circles
Yeah, instead of just the area and mass, we could have the dimensions (length and width for boxes) (radius for Circles) and we could also have the weight (Mass * g) but this would be only useful if you were doing planetary systems (like what I do).
<- Designed by PhysicsGuy-

xplane80 - Posts: 498
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:28 pm
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests



