Wrong terms for breakability
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
Wrong terms for breakability
There is something I had noticed some time ago. It has not yet been fixed. It's called "Impulse break limit" (chains), "Break limit" (axles) or "Axle impulse" (axle information menu) in Algodoo and expressed in Ns. Algodoo seems to be calculating "Axle impulse" by dividing the force applied on the axle by simulation frequency, which is wrong and makes axles more (or less) breakable after changing frequency.
The breakability of axles should depend on force, not impulse, so I suggest calling it "Break limit" (chains) "Axle normal force" (in the information menu) and use N, making it dependant on force only, not frequency.
The breakability of axles should depend on force, not impulse, so I suggest calling it "Break limit" (chains) "Axle normal force" (in the information menu) and use N, making it dependant on force only, not frequency.
-
Ivan - Posts: 202
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:01 pm
- Location: Croatia
Re: Wrong terms for breakability
this thread is a duplicate of viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7130
- jon_joy_1999
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Wrong terms for breakability
jon_joy_1999 wrote:this thread is a duplicate of viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7130
Which was posted a year ago, completely ignored, and buried in this forum section, never to be seen again.
TheWinkits wrote:They both looks of cuking amazing
-
Chronos - [Most Active Member 2010]
- Posts: 4457
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:00 pm
- Location: Californania
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests